Planjava - Wisiakova Gully
|
| pohodnik115. 04. 2020 16:46:51 |
Uršić.... if you climbed this today, I pity you... obviously you respect nothing... but still I wish you to stay healthy... there'll always be time for such ascents...
| (+18) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| Stas5. 04. 2020 18:10:38 |
Nice otherwise but very irresponsible despite all warnings... As if no rules apply to some...
| (+15) | | |
|
|
|
|
| ltkroznik5. 04. 2020 18:25:38 |
Bravo.....just that you didn't/didn't go to another municipality....hahaha. Nice tour, hats off. Good luck
| (+5) | | |
|
|
|
|
| AnteP5. 04. 2020 19:21:39 |
Me too 
| (+4) | | |
|
|
|
|
| redbull5. 04. 2020 19:27:06 |
If you look at the rules, he played by them. He was in the municipality, the paths are discouraged or closed. I hope it is known what path closure means. We could remember the path to Skuta from the south side closed for 2 years. The closure regulation is one thing, the other is that matter more or less fuck because we are not in that municipality  . Nothing to blame here. Given his experience, no question.
Good luck
| (+5) | | |
|
|
|
|
| djimuzl5. 04. 2020 19:56:13 |
Contradiction - perverse adherence to rules...
| (+5) | | |
|
|
|
|
| lino5. 04. 2020 20:05:26 |
If some rule or recommendation was violated here, it can be overlooked and tolerated. Obviously Dr. Uršič assessed that in case something goes wrong, he will take care of himself and rescue himself. So GRS, helicopter team and emergency won't be burdened. 
| (+5) | | |
|
|
|
|
| Maemi5. 04. 2020 20:23:30 |
A bit provocative to post this He himself knows what is in his comfort zone, has knowledge and is aware of the situation.
More unpleasant is the person who climbs after him
| (+6) | | |
|
|
|
|
| djimuzl5. 04. 2020 21:10:21 |
Probably surveyors, to help coordinate the border of the new Kamnik-Solčava municipality
| (+4) | | |
|
|
|
|
| KUKI776. 04. 2020 07:11:05 |
And what's wrong? Provocative is the waiting of the police under Mala planina, instead of on Volovjek. Or closing marked paths, and diverting hikers to Rigelj. Just hope nothing happens there. And provocative are all responses from some who wait in ambush...
Stupidity is the measure regarding municipalities.
Now collecting private areas, another provocation. And what follows?, eruption of djimuzl.
| (+10) | | |
|
|
|
|
| fpetel16. 04. 2020 08:51:51 |
If the path is closed and something happens to you, you pay from your own pocket. You potentially endanger the health system, which is irresponsible.
Some indicators show that in a few weeks everything will be ok - so why not wait and walk on open paths.
| (+6) | | |
|
|
|
|
| fpetel16. 04. 2020 12:31:53 |
Because those responsible here can judge how great the current danger is.
These days data show that the danger is not great, but it can change quickly (I believe it won't).
| (+3) | | |
|
|
|
|
| VanSims6. 04. 2020 13:37:03 |
This is what we have now from this exaggerated and disproportionate measure of staying in the municipality. Cowardice, which of course can harm a lot in the long run.
Now everything is allowed, as long as you stay in your own municipality. No more 'stay home' but 'stay in your municipality'. There you can do whatever you want. Eh, but if you stick your nose into another municipality, it's already dangerous! Then you can immediately infect someone or get infected yourself. In your own municipality, not at all. And sooner or later this will be the mentality adopted by people who can't think with their heads.
The police behave the same: they will fine you at the top of Šmarna gora, which is in MOL even if you're coming from Vodiška or Medvoška municipality, which also have part of the mountain. In that article that Primož linked at Orlah, they fined them because they were in another municipality, not because they were gathering. But if they were in their own municipality, the virus couldn't be transmitted? I mean...
There was no need for this measure. Even if tourist places were really full. They would just close them. Hmm, we can't go on an excursion anymore, well let's go visit our old mom or to Lojze for a shot! Both live in the same municipality!
Until now I've supported the measures although I think they shouldn't have shut down the economy like that (regarding taverns, events,... and other less important things, no problem). But they should have taken better care of the elderly and other at-risk groups! I mean, here all of Slovenia is in quarantine, can't stick your nose out, economy is sacrificed,... but in nursing homes it's free as per Prešeren. In Ljutomer until the first infections, residents were freely going out, accepting visits,... as if nothing!
| (+7) | | |
|
|
|
|
| jax6. 04. 2020 13:55:17 |
The publicly stated reasons for introducing the restriction of movement to one's own municipality were two:
1. Influx of excursionists to tourist spots on the Coast and in Gorenjska.
2. Influx of injured to the Ljubljana emergency, which allegedly didn't lag behind average nice weekends at all.
Both turned out to be lies. There are data, link them. So - it's clear there must be something else behind it.
| (+7) | | |
|
|
|
|
| djimuzl6. 04. 2020 14:11:59 |
So they could more easily conduct a "drill" of monitoring movement restrictions between municipalities across the whole country. Which will serve as a basis for possible future restrictions...
Just as we need fresh air, sun and movement in nature, the authorities need control over citizens to breathe easier and carry out their activities..
| (+6) | | |
|
|
|
|
| dprapr6. 04. 2020 14:16:12 |
"Both turned out to be lies."
I don't know, I still believe someone with a name and surname more, who dealt with these injured and webcams, than some unknown on this forum.
But I agree that this measure of movement only in one's own municipality was a bit too harsh. Not because I can't go anywhere myself, namely even before I followed GRS recommendations and similar, but because I think it could be controlled and limited differently.
| (+8) | | |
|
|
|
|
| MitjaBelak6. 04. 2020 16:17:32 |
djimuzl, as far as I see, everything is much less, only suicides are a higher number. Interesting or worrying regarding suicides. If we go by %, that's 300% more suicides. Where are you journalists!
| (+3) | | |
|
|
|
|
| SamoK6. 04. 2020 17:07:04 |
>If we go by % that's 300% more suicides.
How much math did you have in elementary school?
| (+1) | | |
|
|
|
|
| djimuzl6. 04. 2020 17:53:01 |
Mitja, I hope it's not like those few numbers suggest, the sample is definitely too small for such a (statistical) conclusion. But actually for some these depressive crisis times are much harder than say for us, who here mostly complain just about movement restrictions that prevent us from unhindered mountain roaming...
And Samo - yes, 200% more. Don't you ever make mistakes?
| (+1) | | |
|
|
|
You must log in to post a comment:
If you do not yet have a username, you must first
register.