@Becar: "Despite numerous doctors and scientists with different opinions, no public expert debates, arguments for and against vaccination with experimental vaccines. Only one right, one truth,"
The problem with conspiracy theories around covid and vaccination (and many others), is that there are tons of them and many contradictory. I wrote about it many pages ago. Who should I believe? Just around vaccination (let alone corona itself): one says that all vaccinated will die in two years, one that we'll be infertile, one says they're chipping us, one depopulating us, one says it's pharma conspiracy, one Bill Gates,...
If we look just at @Becar, how many contradictory theses he has already attached. Maybe you'd believe him more if he advocated just one, consistent.
Who to believe then? If you don't believe, you're automatically a sheep. I've already compared it to religions. There's a whole bunch and each is of course right. The others who don't believe are fuj, pagans, unbelievers,...
The experts on the other side have a unified view (of course there are debates and opinions) but the main things are unified. Of course new things are always discovered. The disease is new, we don't know everything about it yet. That's why it comes to that: yeah they said differently before. Come on you who oppose the experts, have one unified, expert-supported opinion. Then you can be a worthy opponent to the experts,
@pantani1: " all the time, not interested to broaden horizons to the part of the profession on the other side of covid trenches and censored. Why, if the virus is natural origin and everything around it spontaneous and random? In a year and after there wasn't even one confrontation of opposing expert opinions, not one!"
Not because no one invited them, but because they don't want to themselves. Because it's easy to rant without evidence on forums, FB,... 70 percent of people are stupid and you immediately find supporters and cheerers. When someone else rants again, they'll cheer that one. But confronting arguments is harder. The virologist Gorazd Pretnar invited Potrč to debate but he refused. Here!