|
| Becar17. 05. 2021 15:32:46 |
Dear folks, hello, I see you missed me already. In the meantime while I was away, the Corona orchestra already played one, but messed it up pretty badly. Lino, kinetic weight doesn't exist, you probably meant kinetic energy. Nezavest, I just looked at WHO data, I selected the latest data, that is for the last year and what did I notice. Example USA, which we already processed say. Crude death rate 9.04. That is as expected compared to previous years. First tell me if you don't like this data again, then we'll go further into analysis  link
| (+2) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| zavest17. 05. 2021 16:15:30 |
| (+2) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| Becar17. 05. 2021 16:45:24 |
Yes, now I see you're blabbering a hundred per hour. On that indicator metadata registry list it says absolutely nothing about projection for 2020 for crude death rate, which you claim. So you don't strain too much, hint for you, on the map the data were recently updated. In April they were still last year's, you have to stay current, not open a page for the first time and be the smartest.  But of course projections are also available, on the right side you have links for I don't know how many next years, if you're interested 
| (+2) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| zavest17. 05. 2021 16:54:14 |
Just one blabbering with wrong data and that's not me. Your understanding of data is about as top-notch as this cover My Heart Will Go On Don't be too loud about fudging Coronics  On the links from the previous post, it's all written black on white, in English though, where the data comes from and what kind of estimates they are. If you need a translation into Slovenian or a more understandable explanation, say so and I'll (we'll) try.
| (+2) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| zavest17. 05. 2021 17:25:42 |
Paste the source where it's clearly visible that these are your "current, freshly updated data". I pasted black on white that they aren't and that it's old demographic projections. Again it turns out you're looking for conspiracy theories and don't get that this has been standard procedure for years in such matters. If concepts like "projection" and "assumptions" aren't clear to you, then as said even JJ can't help you. To make the irony even greater, you hit the years, just mixed up the order ... in 2019 they made projection for April 2021 - exactly what you're pasting here now in your "eureka" moment Really, I can't believe you're doing this for the third time in a row 
| (+2) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| Becar17. 05. 2021 17:35:16 |
You've completely lost it. Once again, in April all countries on the world map had the year 2020, data was different. In May countries got year 2021, data is different. That means data for the last year. Same data shows up if you check the latest current data. Projections are for the following years, that's why they don't show when you click the check for latest current data. They measure these data somehow mid-year, not calendar year. Here there's no talk of any projections. I'm still impatiently waiting for your source that the latest data is a projection.  Better stop, because now you're really embarrassing yourself.
| (+2) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| Becar17. 05. 2021 18:41:18 |
Have you seen, journalists have only now discovered that along the Ganges they cremate and/or bury people and that the Ganges is the largest cemetery in India. Year 2021 - year of wonders. Here you have the opportunity to give your signature for constitutional change regarding vaccination, discrimination of unvaccinated and do something useful for this society. Electronic signature with digital certificate is also possible. link
| (+3) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| zavest17. 05. 2021 19:01:06 |
Once again, last time in this round, until next: source is above, everything is nicely written, where the data or projections come from and from which year. You just need to understand what's written. Which is of course more demanding than reading numbers, and you've already proven you don't master that  If you want to back up your claims based on old projections, paste link and screenshot so we debunk you there too 
| (+1) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| Becar17. 05. 2021 19:03:03 |
Nothing is written anywhere that you claim. Better get into debate about old moms (gilf), that suits you much better.
| (+1) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| zavest17. 05. 2021 19:21:23 |
We're there, classic denial in the style of "fake news". Hope you didn't drink too much cow urine today, like this Indian fighting covid: yellow press, literally  The GILF population we happily leave to you, so keep delving deeper, according to testimonies you do better with that than with numbers 
| (+1) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| Becar17. 05. 2021 19:42:00 |
You denied yourself, you post some useless links that are completely unrelated to what you're saying. Better give some GILF link, surely you have a whole row in favorites. I didn't even know what that means until now. Well, you taught me something. Probably have lots of practice. Watch out for callused hands.
| (+1) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| Majdag17. 05. 2021 19:44:30 |
Every smile counts..
| (+6) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| VanSims18. 05. 2021 04:10:51 |
What comes first: constitution, administration or state? First the state then the constitution, then the administration. While we're at it: Fine Lord to his Lady after wedding night: "I hope you've conceived milady, because I don't intend to repeat these ridiculous movements anymore."
| (+3) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| pantani118. 05. 2021 07:16:14 |
zavest, meaning if you're highly educated you don't need to wash hands when coming from WC, plus I assume you go number two too. With this you showed your education level and it's precisely because of people like you that the virus spreads. First condition to stop the virus is hygiene!!!
| (+6) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| herman818. 05. 2021 08:23:57 |
pantani1... this doesn't apply to you, so there's no misunderstanding....
1
| (+4) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| pantani118. 05. 2021 09:48:15 |
No problem 
| (+1) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| zavest18. 05. 2021 10:34:14 |
Pantani, it's a joke, not a dick, don't take it so hard  Three engineers were in the bathroom standing at the urinals. The first engineer finished and walked over to the sink to wash his hands. He then proceeded to dry his hands very carefully. He used paper towel after paper towel and ensured that every single spot of water on his hands was dried. Turning to the other two engineers, he said, "At Hewlett Packard, we are trained to be extremely thorough." The second engineer finished his task at the urinal and he proceeded to wash his hands. He used a single paper towel and made sure that he dried his hands using every available portion of the paper towel. He turned and said, "At Lockheed-Martin, not only are we trained to be extremely thorough, but we are also trained to be extremely efficient." The third engineer finished and walked straight for the door, shouting over his shoulder, "At Apple Computer, Inc. we don't pee on our hands." --------- As for stopping the virus, the first condition is not hygiene, see picture 
1
|
|
|
|
| Aljoman18. 05. 2021 11:22:27 |
One would wish that slobs had at least learned basic hygiene during this corona madness, but obviously it didn't help much. If you don't wash your hands for yourself, at least do it for others. In all this it's good that handshaking went out of fashion.
| (+2) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| VanSims18. 05. 2021 11:53:51 |
I've stopped picking my nose! 
|
|
|
You must log in to post a comment:
If you do not yet have a username, you must first
register.