|
| otiv13. 06. 2017 16:03:21 |
Regarding spleenworts, more needs to be clarified. Below are two shots of Kamnik spleenwort and they look different even visually and I agree with foreign botanists, as I read online, that there are several species of Kamnik spleenworts.
 1 2
| (+2) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| otiv13. 06. 2017 17:59:57 |
@kati1909, definitely shaggy whitlow-grass.
Photo 21 is hairy rock-cress.
Photo 18 is not rock speedwell.
|
|
|
|
| velkavrh13. 06. 2017 18:17:22 |
kati1909
no. 20-mountain lady's mantle
no.8 and 18-it's the same cress-Brassicaceae family-I think it could be Bohinj cress, definitely not alpine-leaves not visible well. Very similar to pygmy cress.
Only no. 22 left, looks like some rock-cress. Otherwise there are 40-50 species of rock-cress, two even grow in Australia. After studying rock-cresses I concluded it's pyramidal rock-cress.
|
|
|
|
| Apolonija13. 06. 2017 21:18:56 |
Flower-loving friends, good evening!
Every day you offer something new, beautiful.
Otiv, Brane, please explain how you identify whitlow-grasses. How do you know it's shaggy and not hairy in the pic?
Does the anemone have characteristic leaves for the three-leaved one?
Don't you think that pyramidal rock-cress (22) has such leaves?
The low primrose has a hairy leaf rosette and stem. Can it be ruled out from the photo?
curious Apolonija
|
|
|
|
| otiv13. 06. 2017 21:35:56 |
Good evening!
Hairy whitlow-grass has only hairy leaf edges. On Kati's photo stems are also hairy, so it's shaggy whitlow-grass.  
|
|
|
|
| Apolonija13. 06. 2017 23:00:47 |
Otiv, thanks for the reply. Regarding the leaves I agree, regarding the stems not. Do you think that at the hairy one they aren't hairy?
|
|
|
|
| velkavrh14. 06. 2017 06:36:14 |
I decided for pyramidal rock-cress, because almost identical picture of this rock-cress is published on Zaplana net.
Really both mentioned whitlow-grasses are very similar by the flowers. You determine them exactly by leaf rosettes, which are different.
In three-leaved anemone leaves are larger and positioned higher on the stem. Wood anemone flowers much earlier. Three-leaved grows higher.
For determining primroses we really need good shot of leaves, stem, leaf rosette.
|
|
|
|
| otiv14. 06. 2017 08:37:00 |
I surrender...
| (+2) | | |
|
|
|
|
| velkavrh14. 06. 2017 11:57:16 |
Tomorrow I'll photograph Begunjščica.
|
|
|
|
| kati190914. 06. 2017 12:51:45 |
Yes, I nicely stirred up your floral idyll; it's interesting and instructive to follow you in your thoughts "which flower is this". Maybe this isn't the right title for posting my photos, but your knowledge enriches the photo and me. I don't have technical knowledge like Otiv, Brane, Zlatica..., whose shots "don't give Apolonija much work", but I proceed from the realization that it's dearer to establish a personal - emotional contact with the photo subject (flower). Every photo should also have a story in itself and to achieve that, you also need the name (of the flower), as the "dot on the i", so I "steal" your knowledge too; thanks!
Brane; pictures no. 8 and 18 show the same flower photographed together; and also: all shots are from Dleskovska plateau!
|
|
|
|
| Apolonija14. 06. 2017 21:29:14 |
Kati, welcome! Here we are neither photographers nor biologists. We love nature, just like you do. Determining plant names is a joy, help, sometimes a challenge to read something, chat and learn together. Very often exact determination of names from photos is impossible. We'd need the little flowers in front of us, know what to check (know specific features), sometimes even under a microscope.... but we're not biologistsTherefore it's often enough to find out which genus the plant belongs to. I think it's better to admit that we often can't just determine the species either.
Otiv, don't be too modest. Your knowledge of little flowers is more than great
|
|
|
|
| peter215. 06. 2017 12:25:04 |
 1
| (+5) | | |
|
|
|
|
| Apolonija15. 06. 2017 14:21:15 |
peter2, thanks. In Bohinj really many different orchids grow, also rare tuberous bee orchid
|
|
|
|
| zlatica15. 06. 2017 15:01:54 |
Bravo, peter2, you're impressing us and introducing us to botanical rarities.
|
|
|
|
| Deniss15. 06. 2017 18:54:08 |
Shaggy whitlow-grass would differ from the hairy one in that its leaves would be entirely hairy from below and not just on the margin, as with the hairy one...
 1
|
|
|
You must log in to post a comment:
If you do not yet have a username, you must first
register.