gmajna - Recent messages

strelec, no need to go back up so much, there are several paths there.

To which cliffs? If you reached the rocks above the hunting hut - there is a hunting path that nicely bypasses them and descends to the hut (see drawn track).

Muddy clearings can also be avoided; where the clearing meets the fence of hruš.planine, in the west direction find the path that goes straight to the hunting hut.

I mostly have a light running cap with a visor, summer and winter. If colder, a bit thicker cap with a visor, from cotton. Otherwise one proper hat always in the backpack, but I rarely use it. If it's blowing hard, the hood from the windbreaker is enough.
Ears don't worry me, no frostbite yet, I tolerate cold much better than heat. And this season there hasn't been any real cold yet anyway.

I was up there Saturday too, snow is rather little, new shipment wouldn't hurt. (pics)

So Požgana Mlinarica?

No, state border goes along highest point of ridge, so both summits ours!
On height - picture says more than a thousand words...

Mangart is behind Dolkova špica (on the first photo you can see a small piece of white there in the back, check your photo at 100% zoom); what you marked on the photo is quite far aside.
Find your peak on the panorama:
panorama

this one will be easy too

dovška rožca

@primoza, on gore.net there's no mountain content, on gore-ljudje.net the forum is practically dead, about 10 messages a month, mostly lost items, check the latest posts.
The only lively thing there are trail reports on the front page; seems admins or site owners don't want a working forum.

That's what you get if you stick to outdated bureaucratic ID system, dead forum. Any sense writing on such forum? No.

Well, but then you have to carry a bag of stones with you, there aren't many stones on pastures, right?

The situation already somewhat reminds of that famous Indian one - what did Winnetou do when he met a bear; he hid behind a big rock that he was carrying just for that purpose.

And one more thing, these thumbs up down are not a measure of quality, just a measure of likability.

I prefer people who dare to think with their own head and dare to say their opinion, even if they might sometimes be a bit annoying because of it (as long as they are not offensive, nothing wrong); rather than yes-men who write messages like "I agree", "+1"...

The slogan "all different, all equal" is closer to me, than a system that based on online voting disables differently thinking people, especially if the admin is looking for the "right measure how quickly and strictly to punish users".

I tested a bit, it's obvious that for you the same computer is the same IP, although for the registration attempt I used another computer, not this one on which I'm writing this. This way you block entire networks, both home and office, various open networks where many people use the same IP, and at the same time you don't prevent access to those with dynamic addresses (e.g. most siol users).

I think repressive policy on forums doesn't pay off, on the contrary you embitter the life of potential new users, who about such a forum that requires an email request for registration, well they think what they think. In the future will a written application and copy of ID be needed?

It would make sense to delete messages that annoy the majority, not to carry out blocks that experienced users can of course bypass. If I wanted to spam, I can make a bunch of new users, with minimal work for each use another proxy, or access via anonymization network (tor). Even simpler is to use neighbor's unsecured wifi for registration, there are still plenty.

Senseless debates are simply reduced as larger forums do it - that insolent or offensive message is deleted immediately or asap, of course the forum must have a team of moderators who regularly read the forum, this seems like one-man-band?

yes, Mrežce, a bit below the summit

no

no