Slovenian two-thousanders
|
| DVas7. 08. 2026 13:37:06 |
I have updated the height and coordinates of the two-thousanders on the website according to the latest digital relief model obtained with the above-mentioned cyclic laser scanning of Slovenia.
I am also attaching a list of 284 peaks with a prominence of 30 meters, if anyone is interested.
https://limewire.com/d/zZZA7#xpOUuevIVK
| (+2) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| julya7. 08. 2026 14:12:00 |
Interesting, but it doesn't open for me...
|
|
|
|
| julya7. 08. 2026 14:41:06 |
|
|
|
|
| lijaneja7. 08. 2026 17:26:14 |
To me this list isn't the clearest, or rather how precise this scanning is. You mention prominence of 30 meters, but on the list you have double (even equally high) peaks, like Kanjavec, Rjavina, Planja..., but not, if I list just some of the highest: Mali Triglav, Rjavec, Mali Oltar, Široka peč...
Also, has the digital relief lowered Dovški križ by 25 meters for you?
Ah, no, now I see that it's written twice.
|
|
|
|
| asdf7. 08. 2026 20:08:16 |
As far as I see on freemap.eu, the saddle between Triglav and Mali Triglav is only about 20 m lower than Mali Triglav, meaning its prominence is also that much. The saddle between the two peaks of Kanjavec is for example about 40 m lower than both peaks, meaning the prominence of the lower one of them is about 40 m. The difference in peak heights doesn't matter here, what's important is how much higher the peak is than the lowest contour line that surrounds it and within which this peak is the highest.
| (+3) | | |
|
|
|
|
| mirank7. 08. 2026 20:58:43 |
Eh, that isn't a peak for me at all, since it doesn't deserve to be chosen for an independent ascent.
| (+1) | | |
|
|
|
|
| Loerst8. 08. 2026 00:10:13 |
@DVas Super, thanks for the post.
I quickly looked, due to time constraints only the Karawanks, because it's the fastest and I have four things:
a) How exactly did you arrive at the heights? Because according to the DMR1 model derived from LIDAR, at some peaks your data differs minimally from the model. E.g. Vrtača has 2179.32 m (on the list 2180 m), Krkotnik has 2114.72 m (2113 m), Tolsta Košuta 2056.73 m (2058 m)... Lidar has an estimated standard error +-15 cm, with you there is a bit more difference. I'm not claiming you're wrong, because nowhere does it say you have to start exactly from DMR1, you could go directly to points from the Lidar cloud, but you have larger values in some places, smaller in others.
b) Did you make a list of Slovenian two-thousanders or just two-thousanders? Because up there you also have Križnik and Velika glava on Peca, which are already quite concretely on the Austrian side. Additional check would also be needed for Grad and Ostrv, because maybe the highest point is a meter over the border.
c) Tolsta Košuta has two peaks and both have prominence more than 30 m (you have only the eastern peak on the list)
d) "Unnamed candidate" on the list is another Gamsovka. There are four in total, but your 30 m prominence criterion is met by two.
| (+1) | | |
|
|
|
|
| DVas11. 08. 2026 09:48:38 |
|
|
|
You must log in to post a comment:
If you do not yet have a username, you must first
register.