Slovenian two-thousanders
|
| julya9. 12. 2020 21:36:18 |
Aha, thanks. And is this determined in some topographic maps or elsewhere? Another question: sometimes I read that the criterion for a peak is 30 meters of relative height, elsewhere 50m...
|
|
|
|
| lijaneja2. 01. 2021 18:31:36 |
The criterion for a peak is the name and measured height
| (+2) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| DVas24. 06. 2026 18:41:05 |
Hello.
Quite some time ago I started a project that arose from the desire for a clear list of Slovenian peaks over 2000 meters and simple recording of conquered peaks. Until recently the project was abandoned, but then I somehow brought it step by step to the point where it is now. At first I intended to use it only for myself, then I decided to publish it as a website. Maybe it will be useful to someone else:
https://www.dvatisocaki.si
The website currently works without user registration and without a central database. Marking of conquered peaks is stored locally in your browser. If you delete browser data or change devices, the history of conquered peaks may be lost.
The data on the site is collected from publicly available sources, including portals Hribi.net, OpenStreetMap, Google and Wikipedia. The list of peaks is based on the list of Slovenian two-thousanders published on Wikipedia.
It should be emphasized that there is no single official definition of a two-thousander. The classification of an individual peak may depend on various criteria, such as the independence of the peak, prominence and the like. Different sources also provide different data on heights, names or locations of peaks. For some less visited peaks very little information is available.
Although the site contains links to maps, GPS points and additional information, do not use the data as the sole source for tour planning. Among Slovenian two-thousanders there are quite a few peaks with unmarked, very demanding or alpine approaches. Before visiting an individual peak, always find out additionally about the difficulty of the tour, current conditions and necessary equipment.
As this is an amateur project, errors in data entry, missing information or incorrect links are possible. If you notice an error or have a suggestion for improvement, I will be happy to inform anyone. As this is a hobby project, changes are not expected overnight.
The website is also adapted for use on mobile phones, but due to the amount of data and the clarity of the maps, the user experience is currently still better on a computer.
The project will possibly continue to develop. If there is enough interest, user registration and synchronization of conquered peaks between different devices can also be added in the future.
Good luck and a safe step in the mountains!
| (+9) | | |
|
|
|
|
| lijaneja27. 06. 2026 17:05:46 |
You've put a lot of effort into the statistics. I took a quick look at my data and immediately realized that we have different criteria. As I've mentioned somewhere before, for me a Slovenian two-thousander is a hill, mountain or elevation that has a certain height and at least on some map also a name. I only looked into the Julian Alps and counted 41 peaks that you don't have on the list, but you accidentally put Dovška mala Kepa and Pungrat on it.
Be well!
Tone
|
|
|
|
| turbo27. 06. 2026 20:42:15 |
Hand on heart, strictly speaking probably no one has stood and no one will stand on all Slovenian two-thousanders. Kern has a detailed list, which also includes some peaks that are not domestic, then the one above from DVas, Tone has his own, then there's Wiki here, and more can be found. More or less "official" and more or less accurate. There will always be some ridge or small ridge somewhere that could be a summit or not, on some maps some are there, on others not and similar. Over the years you come to the dilemma whether to think more about those you (still) haven't done or about those you have, whether they are "real" peaks or not. Anyway, the important thing is to go while you still can 
| (+4) | | |
|
|
|
|
| dprapr27. 06. 2026 20:49:42 |
Because of different lists it's really hard to say how many there are. But for two I know they have conquered over 400!
| (+2) | | |
|
|
|
|
| DVas29. 06. 2026 10:16:25 |
I corrected Pungrat and Dovško mala Kepo. Also some other peaks were incorrectly classified. I have now arranged it. Thanks.
| (+3) | | |
|
|
|
|
| Trobec30. 06. 2026 20:32:31 |
This list as I see it is made according to M and M. Why they chose exactly these peaks at the start is a question for them But as far as I see most of those who take on the 2000ers challenge work according to their list. There is also an expanded one and Tone, I agree that on this basic list quite a few are still missing. But there are also peaks on it that really aren't. Immediately Teme por Rjavino comes to mind for example. It actually doesn't even have 2m relative height (or prominence) which by no criterion can be a peak. But yeah, until we get some "official" list, e.g. from the Geodetic Administration, it will always be a matter of debate how many 2000ers we have.
| (+3) | | |
|
|
|
|
| dprapr1. 07. 2026 14:46:31 |
Of course they work according to their list because it has the most objective approach descriptions! All other descriptions are more for reading during the tour.
|
|
|
|
| turbo1. 07. 2026 16:56:58 |
| (+2) | | |
|
|
|
|
| lijaneja1. 07. 2026 17:48:46 |
You mean Skodlco 1919 near the Lopučnica pasture on Komna?
|
|
|
|
| turbo1. 07. 2026 21:11:41 |
I'm not thinking anything, I just gave the link to the article in PV from 1994 where the discussion is precisely on this topic. How many two-thousanders there are here, how to determine them and how on some maps some peaks have incorrectly stated heights, among them also Skodelica. The article also states that according to the author there should be 349 two-thousanders here ...
In plain words, as far as our two-thousanders are concerned: "I count, I count and I just can't get them counted"
| (+2) | | |
|
|
|
|
| lijaneja1. 07. 2026 21:52:24 |
Well, every spring they have young.
| (+1) | | |
|
|
|
|
| DVas2. 07. 2026 08:14:50 |
I started from the list that is on Wikipedia. The mentioned list I think is based on the list from the mountain journal, turbo posted the link. I'm attaching screenshots.
|
|
|
|
| Trobec2. 07. 2026 15:59:08 |
Well there really are some differences compared to the M and M list. I didn't go through the whole list but what immediately caught my eye is that Adam and Eva are listed here as one peak.
|
|
|
|
| Hammond2. 07. 2026 17:32:03 |
Zapotoški vrh is not 2k.
Central pillar, Sphinx - mountaineering names of subdivisions, not a peak. There are countless pillars in this sense.
Tired Tower is nothing more than a landmark.
Which part of BG is Lanterna?
And those Mangrt ones are also foreign to me: Rob above Zagače, Remšendolska škrbina, Rdeča skala, Strmi nos, Huda škrbina.
Arguments?
| (+1) | | |
|
|
|
|
| lijaneja3. 07. 2026 10:34:00 |
Škrbine are škrbine, not 'štrline'.
The following could easily be added to the list with a clear conscience: Vrh rokavskega grebena, Mali Jalovec, Zahodni vrh Kanjavca, Triglavski Vogel, Zahodni Zvonik, Zahodni vrh Planje, Oltarček, Južni vrh Vršakov, Prestreljeniški stolp, Vrh hude Škrbine, Plemenice, Gornja Kopica, Lopa, Veliki stolp Kanceljnov,.....
|
|
|
|
| Hammond3. 07. 2026 12:44:21 |
I agree regarding the saddles.
Sveti trije Rokavi dominate, the other peaks somehow don't assert themselves.
Kanjavec certainly has two summits.
Is Triglavski Vogel marked anywhere as a peak or is it just an area in the shadow of Mali Triglav between Planika and Kredarica?
Zvonik certainly has two, the western one is even more accessible.
If you go over the Kanceljnov ridge, you solve a lot.
The little altar has established itself more as a specialty and less as a peak.
For Kopice, no one knows exactly which is which.
Lopa near Šite is just an alpinistic name for the pre-summit of the mentioned mountain.
Eh, one big cross with these peaks.
| (+3) | | |
|
|
|
|
| Trobec3. 07. 2026 13:55:49 |
Not to mention the multitude of Glavs on Kaninski podi. And sometimes the summit isn't even placed on the highest point, but on a lower one, some 50m as the crow flies from the higher point, which is unnamed 
|
|
|
You must log in to post a comment:
If you do not yet have a username, you must first
register.