I'm not talking about vacation, because I leave the decision to each individual separately and they can go anywhere. But, given that they are talking to us about reducing traffic, sustainability and the green transition. Who has less impact on nature, the one who goes to the mountains for the whole day (once a day by car there and back) and of course spends the whole day for that or the one who drives and walks to the ,,wedge,, takes a photo and drives out. And the next one then into the valley..etc. Statistically speaking, there will always be max 200 vehicles in the valley. I've already said several times that they should turn the price list around, and charge those who come for an ,,hour,, the most. I won't talk about public transport to the valley, because people then walk through the valley on foot and hitchhike when there is no bus. And once again, this is not a ,,shopping center,, that is open all day and you can go there whenever you feel like it, but it is a mountain world, in which whether you want it or not, you are also dependent on the time you spend there. I would definitely charge foreigners more. If nothing else, we here pay taxes, tolls etc....they don't, but they are treated the same. What worries me though is that ,,local sheriffs,, following the example of Vrata and Vršič, will start behaving the same everywhere, and will put ,,barriers,, at all starting points and very high parking fees. And then ,,mountain hiking,, will become a privilege of the wealthy. Kind of like what the USA did at this year's World Cup in football, when the tickets were extremely expensive, but we know that football is a sport of the masses. And also, doctors recommend movement in nature, visiting mountains etc...then visiting the mountain is a financial luxury.