|
| miri5. 05. 2017 21:06:35 |
Interesting comparison of views of pics 8 and 10. Everything just revolves around measurements.
|
|
|
|
| Challice6. 05. 2017 00:46:17 |
Probably now it's already clean.. it was like this on 3.5.
1
| (+3) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| dprapr8. 05. 2017 09:51:56 |
Nice pictures, it was a pleasure to look at them.
| (+1) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| karibu10. 05. 2017 18:59:46 |
As the previous posters wrote, the pothole this year really looks more like a "washbasin" but it's still worth going to see it. LP
| (+6) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| dprapr23. 03. 2018 19:27:33 |
Nice how it's piling up this year...
| (+6) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| lijaneja23. 03. 2018 20:11:31 |
This year Škaf will really be a true attraction.
| (+3) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| jax20. 04. 2018 21:27:10 |
Christ, there's a lot of snow. This should all be snow-free by now ...
| (+1) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| dprapr1. 05. 2018 16:09:14 |
Wow, it's a full 21m deep.
1
2
| (+4) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| bos1. 05. 2018 21:48:20 |
And what's the greatest known depth?
| (+1) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| turbo1. 05. 2018 21:56:33 |
|
|
|
|
| garmont3. 05. 2018 15:29:36 |
Almost ideal conditions for today's Škaf visit. For viewing Dragotov's measured pothole depth I warmly recommend normal crampons, as every fall into the depth can be fatal here. Especially if taking selfies on the edge... Descent was express, snow almost to the valley.  Lp
| (+8) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| lijaneja3. 05. 2018 18:15:09 |
@turbo, my deepest measured depth of the shaft (from average height of upper edge) was 21. 5. 2006, namely 30.5m. +/- difference possible only half meter due to slope of gravelly bottom, which of course I didn't see. @garmont, on pic 5 I feel bottom not broken through yet, looks too white. Thanks for putting the box in place. One more tip. Besides crampons, helmet strongly recommended on perimeter walk. Occasional stone projectiles stick deep in snow.
| (+3) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| garmont3. 05. 2018 18:32:53 |
The shaft is pierced. 
1
| (+2) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| dprapr3. 05. 2018 18:41:40 |
Of course the bottom is visible. For now there are two dry holes at the bottom, one bigger and one smaller, which will soon merge. Tone, are you sure it was 30m deep?
1
| (+3) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| lijaneja3. 05. 2018 19:26:42 |
Sure, Drago. When measuring I tie a trekking pole to the rope (no stone at hand) and lower it to the bottom by feel. I repeat at least at two different spots, [make a] knot above. Out of impatience I usually measure the rope on site. I've several times thought to mark the edge height on the wall, but too much j... vaservaga and the real deviation could be too big.
| (+3) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| lijaneja7. 05. 2018 19:50:54 |
To not miss out too much, I also went today. At half nine I was in Matkov valley, just right time, no more need heavy boots with crampons due to softened snow. But rope replaced the weight, main thing of today's trip. Park at standard spot and go on path full of obstacles (snow avalanches, fallen trees), so on return stuck to debris as much as possible, good sliding. For depth measured with suitable stone tied on, luckily at hand. Depth from highest edge to bottom exactly 19m. By shaft edge config, average depth under 18m. Note that due to negligence the box is damaged, nice thick new logbook dedicated to mountain lover already unusable and destroyed. Such people better stay in valley.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
| (+8) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| dprapr7. 05. 2018 22:35:57 |
Takes it deep well and widens at same time. I measured it at the saddle (pic 3) upper right.
| (+1) |  | |
|
|
|
You must log in to post a comment:
If you do not yet have a username, you must first
register.