|
| zlatica21. 07. 2017 20:13:52 |
Brane, isn't it on picture 8 the navadna zdravilka?   and on 3 and 4 nasršeni kamnokreč, because izbrazdani divides into kranjskega, muškatnega and temnopurpurnega. But on the picture there is none of these three listed. lp
| (+1) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| ločanka21. 07. 2017 20:22:53 |
I look at picture 1 above, and think that there is also a mistake in the naming (for me that one is not rožni koren).
|
|
|
|
| Apolonija21. 07. 2017 20:35:33 |
Brane, you cheered us again with numerous flowers. Thanks. Just some names would be good to correct - yesterday's under: 1, 3, 4, 12, 17. Surely you know them yourself. Is on 5 the blue variety of klasasti repuš, because it is usually whitish greenish or maybe Zahlbrucknerjev repuš?
Yes, kobulnice will need to be researched.
|
|
|
|
| Apolonija21. 07. 2017 20:38:48 |
Zlatica, the flower is really like zdravilka's, but the leaves are not visible.
For the second one, I would say it is širokolistni jelenovec - Laserpitium latifolium 
|
|
|
|
| Apolonija22. 07. 2017 09:31:08 |
Brane, good morning!
Meliščni and navadni dežen are really similar and differ by the number of leaf whorls. I myself would have a hard time deciding from the picture which one it is. But you wrote rožni koren, which is a completely different plant. Just like under 10 it is not rožnordeči koren, but dežen. 17 - did you mean Epipactis atrorubens (temnordeča močvirnica)? I haven't heard of krvavordeča yet. Does it exist?
What do you say to Zlatica's remark about kamnokreč?
|
|
|
|
| zlatica22. 07. 2017 12:39:53 |
Otiv, you composed your request so nicely that I must respond immediately, even though I don't know everything. First kamnokreči, which are my favorite topic. 4 is of course grozdasti, at 2 I would otherwise say nasršeni, although I don't see the cushion well despite your nice photo, because very similar and distinguishable from nasršeni only by leaves is sinjezeleni kamnokreč, which also has very similar flowers to the first named. Similar holds for 11. In nature I distinguish them, here it's a bit harder to say 100%. At kamnokreč on picture 3 the leaf rosettes are a bit more visible and it looks a bit more like sinjezeleni
pic.8 everything indicates alpski regrat, since ovjokovi leaves are not at all hairy and nicely green, leaves also match, so it's hard to be anything else in my opinion, although there are many similar "yellows". 12 plazeča sadrenka, the others I wouldn't comment on.
|
|
|
|
| velkavrh22. 07. 2017 15:33:43 |
Let me add my little bit too.
- on picture no. 6 it is undoubtedly alpska krešica.
- on picture no. is kobulnica. Lately I've been paying more attention to them. The flower kobul is like that of the navadni dežen. As I already said, this dežen grows in eight subspecies with us. In higher locations - also above 2,000m - usually grows gorski dežen. Species would be distinguished only by dežen experts. For identifying kobulnice a good picture of leaves is mandatory.
- on picture no. 5 it is one of the small sviščev. Not Triglavski. Snežni has more whorls on the stem, trebušasti has inflated belly, okroglolistni also not. I think it can only be spomladanski or nizki. They are very similar.
The zvončici are probably the trebušasti. I must say, flowers of trebušasti vary a bit in length and plumpness of flowers. In both shown the flower is a bit elongated. Really need to go to the library for Flora Alpina.
|
|
|
|
| Apolonija22. 07. 2017 19:32:32 |
Wow, so much new has piled up here during the day!
otiv, I agree with Zlatica about the rockcresses and dandelion, and with Brane about the other plants too.
The rock-jasmine has a quite characteristic involucre for one of the hogweeds. Inside there are smaller flowers surrounded by those with longer petals. The rose-red one has such structure too.
On 6 you can see a single very characteristic leaf for alpine rockcress.
Gentians! Otiv, you also have tons of knowledge. But it's like that, when photographing we often forget those characteristics that determine the particular plant. Or sometimes we don't even know about them. If you could have photographed the leaf rosette on the gentian, but it seems grass was covering it, many things would be clearer. And close-ups... Anyway, no need to classify everything perfectly, right?
| (+1) | | |
|
|
|
|
| Apolonija22. 07. 2017 20:02:13 |
otiv, replace question mark with hairy hawkweed, bravo.
But your picture 9 from the previous set still intrigues me.
| (+1) | | |
|
|
|
|
| otiv22. 07. 2017 20:29:51 |
Thanks, Apolonija.
This unknown is interesting, maybe not some hybrid.
|
|
|
|
| Apolonija22. 07. 2017 20:34:56 |
Otiv, do you remember anything about it? Size? Is it in reclining position and has several "whorls"? Are there remnants of white petals.....?
|
|
|
|
| Apolonija23. 07. 2017 09:12:44 |
Where there's still question mark-38, 39, it looks like gerardii gentianella.
|
|
|
|
| otiv23. 07. 2017 10:17:03 |
Apolonija, bravo... you really have a sixth sense for flowers. Thanks
|
|
|
|
| Apolonija23. 07. 2017 12:11:16 |
otiv, sometimes this "sense" completely fails me, ha-ha.
|
|
|
|
| Apolonija23. 07. 2017 21:18:36 |
Otiv, good evening.
Still owe for the interesting unknown- 9. With Zlatica we pooled forces and concluded it's round-leaved bladderwort. First the remnants of petals bothered me because they seemed white, but they are just faded. The characteristic husks confirm our finding.
|
|
|
|
| otiv23. 07. 2017 21:48:39 |
Good evening!
Thanks to both for the help. I also got a tip for Kerner's bladderwort. But I haven't seen a picture of the flowering bladderwort anywhere.
|
|
|
|
| Apolonija23. 07. 2017 22:32:43 |
Those husks are similar to those of bladderworts, maybe it's also Kerner's.
|
|
|
You must log in to post a comment:
If you do not yet have a username, you must first
register.