Yeah, and why should I apologize because I don't like it? Do all paths, all approaches have to please me? And because I don't like one, or two, am I a grumbler, without a sense for nature, who hates it? By what logic? Since when is the forum only for positives, praising and piling up praises? Forum is exchange of opinions. My writing isn't under the official path description where it would be taken as some generally accepted fact, but under current conditions, where users give opinions about the path. And as long as my opinion is written politely, without belittling anyone (at most myself with admitting unpreparedness), I really don't know why I have to defend myself. Maybe you shouldn't barge into the forum (as I supposedly barge into the mountain), if you so quickly get such a condemning attitude towards a fellow human's opinion who simply thinks differently from you. I don't walk on the path yelling how pathetic it is, I don't shoot dirty looks at people I meet, the reason why I go into nature doesn't concern you at all and I have the same right to it (and to my impression) as you, so please leave me alone. And while we're at it, I like forests even if there's "nothing" to see. Many factors happened, which can happen to someone else too....the goal was to warn the person going here for the first time to mentally prepare, because the Sunday stroller will otherwise be surprised by the path that can be strenuous and must be taken seriously.
Yes, you attacked. With the obvious that you can comment on me with negative energy, but I can't write a bad opinion about my path. Double standards? Sadly, I can't take anything positive from you, from the path maybe I will, maybe just like Flora suggested...