|
| piotr28. 01. 2020 12:37:54 |
And the new Frischauf hut is put on display.
Of course just one of the projects.
| (+8) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| zokipoki28. 01. 2020 13:17:14 |
I don't really like this sketch.
|
|
|
|
| lijaneja28. 01. 2020 13:41:56 |
Me neither. I think functionality is important for mountain facilities, not aesthetics.
|
|
|
|
| 5Xum28. 01. 2020 14:01:10 |
Aesthetics and functionality are not mutually exclusive. To me the building looks nice, and the junction of masonry and wooden parts is appropriate for a hut standing right at the forest-rocky walls junction.
| (+4) | | |
|
|
|
|
| Lukito28. 01. 2020 14:19:05 |
I'm not a construction expert, but I'm wondering if it's really necessary to tear everything down to the ground. Walls remained, looks like it was made with thick stones not bricks.
If they can already put wood and roof on the existing structure it will surely be faster and much cheaper to build the thing.
It should be financed from state money and contributions. Hope it won't be like other state projects - everything except honest and sensible use of funds.
| (+1) | | |
|
|
|
|
| ejti28. 01. 2020 15:36:00 |
Ugh, I wouldn't say so. In November I helped clean the fire site and I think the walls are too damaged to build anything on them anymore.
| (+2) | | |
|
|
|
|
| exwannabe28. 01. 2020 16:57:16 |
I hope never. As "soulless" as this house looks. Is it really necessary to "scare" the hills with these quasi-modern styles too? Would it really be too much to erect a simple so-called alpine house, if it must be a hut?
Even if they built it as it was, of course with improvements regarding better materials, environmental acceptability and greater energy efficiency, it would be a thousand times better.
 1
| (+6) | | |
|
|
|
|
| mirank28. 01. 2020 17:17:42 |
Unfortunately, there is no urbanism or architecture based on local features anymore. How much such patchworks will cost to execute and then to maintain in local weather conditions, such architects (I call them garbage collectors) never ask.
| (+7) | | |
|
|
|
|
| Becar28. 01. 2020 19:58:06 |
They've smelled money, now it has to be divided among various "smarties", 1001 studies etc... In the end, the price will be as if made of gold and for the same money they could make more pleasant simple huts with homely feel. That's how it goes in this country. Well, let them surprise me if not.
| (+1) | | |
|
|
|
|
| čebejla28. 01. 2020 20:02:39 |
Becar, I agree. Let it stay as it is, that beer or coffee I'll bring myself. And less circus in the season
|
|
|
|
| jprim28. 01. 2020 20:34:27 |
As far as I know, I spoke with the former cook at Korošica, who now helps at the hut on Smrekovec, that they'll build the hut at Okrešelj sooner than at Korošica. Okrešelj is quite a topical spot, also from the profit perspective. That circus thing ...
Cheers!
| (+1) | | |
|
|
|
|
| Janezs28. 01. 2020 21:24:47 |
Whatever they build, just let it be open as many days in the year as possible. Especially in winter time.
| (+5) | | |
|
|
|
|
| sens29. 01. 2020 11:20:21 |
Already from the maintenance perspective the design of the upper project is bad.. too much exposed wood which will be a joy to paint every couple of years up there.. especially with no overhangs and water dripping freely on the facade - stains guaranteed + price of fancy wooden facades isn't small..
| (+2) | | |
|
|
|
|
| Lukito29. 01. 2020 12:31:42 |
Given past experiences, the best would be no wood at all.
|
|
|
|
| felix29. 01. 2020 13:33:53 |
Oh dear, oh dear, where will our old good huts slowly go!
|
|
|
|
| @rekar29. 01. 2020 16:49:01 |
Those sketches I don't like at all and they don't fit in the hills, the hut needs to be built friendly to the mountains and hikers, don't allow architects to play whatever.
| (+2) | | |
|
|
|
|
| andrej.bg29. 01. 2020 17:13:25 |
If I consider for example the bivouacs recently built in the high mountains, the proposed appearance of the new hut on Okrešelj is in the same style and I'd say, creation of the same author. One would think that the authors of these basically beautiful and modern buildings have never ventured into the mountains, don't acknowledge tradition, atmosphere, and don't care about harmony with nature, extreme maintenance conditions and the like. I'm not sure if most mountaineers would even want or dare to enter such an object.
| (+6) | | |
|
|
|
You must log in to post a comment:
If you do not yet have a username, you must first
register.