It's really interesting to follow this discussion, as if I'm reading some HR forum, we're the same ... anti-pro ... I thought you were smarter than us Croats, but I was wrong ...
Like with us, as soon as someone tries to do something, everyone jumps up, greens, yellows, unions, unemployed, retirees, students, and ....
The best argument with us is: we don't want some dirty capitalist to make money off us ... or we just want to live well, our salaries, huts, little houses and whatever else ...
I was there recently, early March in Bohinj for a few days skiing, after almost 30 years. Nothing has changed, Bohinj is deserted and empty, Kobla doesn't work, and on Vogel they've built 2 new cable cars with letters and numbers. In one word, the valley is totally neglected, and when we add that Bledski Zatrnik has been closed for a long time, I guess it's clear to everyone. And then someone appears who would revitalize it a bit, renovate Kobla, make new lifts, some new facilities, and the thing falls on a few owners of a few hundred or thousand square meters of forest. We have similar at home, say golf Dubrovnik, or golf in Istria etc. Do you really think tourism can develop on sun and sea (in HR) or snow and sun and nature (SLO)? Indicator of how profitable it is, say summer tourism in SLO mountains compared to the same in Dolomites. Do you think Dolomites would be full if there weren't about 500 lifts taking you to almost every bigger hill without effort ... plus pools in the valley, various other facilities, that's what tourists want and will pay for ... so if Bohinj wants to return to pre-war tourist numbers, I think no doubt, it needs to build one modern slightly larger ski resort ... we'll still have enough mountains where ordinary tourists can't access...
That's it, best regards from Pula