Yes, Maja, I completely agree with everything you wrote.
But the concrete case seems cruel to me personally. The man lost his wife. I can only sympathize with him and nothing else.
Justice is something else. Certainly useful, but sometimes terribly inhuman and corrupt like politics. Who knows what's behind this verdict - insurance interests seem very possible to me. Anyway, this is only the first instance. What if the husband was also inexperienced, or if she didn't have a transceiver at all. There are still quite a few different variants possible. This is a field for lawyers and there are tons of unanswered questions. The fact is that in Austria the use of avalanche transceiver is not legally prescribed or regulated by other acts.
Of course, Gita, I'm also for using as much safety equipment as possible, especially common sense ... Well, a lot has already been written about this in this debate, Turbo summed it up well. I wrote about the usefulness of the transceiver only from a legal point of view.